Boston Globe

The late Father Charles Murphy was gravely scarred by a false accusation of sexual abuse, writes Boston Globe columnist Brian McGrory. Father Murphy was cleared of the charge after an investigation, but the experience left deep scars.
McGrory’s emotional column highlights the injustices that are suffered by priests who are falsely accused. Yet the lawyer who represented the man accusing Father Murphy still insists that the charge was accurate, and complains that the archdiocesan investigation was a whitewash.

How can anyone know with certainty whether a charge is true or false? In Philadelphia, a grand jury excoriated archdiocesan officials—and even indicted one—for clearing priests of abuse charges. If Father McGrory was innocent, might not those priests be innocent as well? But the grand jury in Philadelphia said that the archdiocesan investigation was too cursory.
Victims’ groups have routinely demanded the public identification of every priest accused of abuse. The McGrory column reminds us how devastating that policy could be for innocent priests who are falsely accused. Still, McGrory’s own newspaper has been sympathetic toward the victims’ demands for public listing.
There is a gross inconsistency when the call for public identification of every accused priest, whether or not there is convincing evidence of guilt, is coupled with a plea for sympathy on behalf of a priest who is wrongfully accused.